Filed under: Saturday Submissions
Author: Reader Submissions
Date: Aug 23, 2009
Tweet
I had an interesting conversation with a gentleman at Out On Screen on Friday.
See, Since Prop 8 was passed on Nov 4th I have made a point of avoiding a couple of businesses like the plague. There is no lack of information on where the money towards supporting Prop 8 came from, nor is it possible to keep secret, the support or money given to said cause from a CEO or President of a popular company.
Although Richard Hayne, #262 richest person in the U.S, has done a good job of wiping any or all traces of his financial contributions towards Prop 8, I will not and have not shopped at his Urban Outfitters chain since November 4th. I refuse to turn a blind eye just so I can buy that trendy shirt and watch my money trickle up into Mr. Hayne’s fat pockets.
Since November 4th, I as well have not attended a movie at Tinseltown, having been rightly informed that Mr. Alan Stock, CEO of Cinemark, contributed a whopping $9,999 out of his own pocket towards vote YES on Proposition 8. I refuse to turn a blind eye just so I can see that blockbuster and watch my money trickle up into Mr. Stock’s fat pockets.
I think we get the point.
Well this has been my personal dilemma for the last nine and a half months. Not a crusade of sorts (although anybody who brings up either company within ear shot of me could plead another case). But I’ve known that being a married gay man, and living the life that I do, that there would be no way that I could give money to someone who has gone out of their way to, not only directly contribute to harming the principles of my lifestyle, but on a larger scale, demean the very basics that make up human rights equalities. Because, in this side of the world, the fight for GLBT equality truly is the last big fight of our lifetime, and any other viewpoint that does not align with the equality of gay persons, will, in the not so distant future, be seen as completely archaic.
I joined Facebook groups, I informed my friends and loved ones, and that was all I felt needed doing for the time being. Until, to my surprise, the Vancouver Queer Film Festival this year, after the vote on November 4th, 2008, continued to house their films in Cinemark Tinseltown.
This left me scratching my head. So I phoned Out On Screen.
The response I got was that, although they obviously do not support Mr. Stock’s decision to contribute $9,999 towards Proposition 8, Cinemark has been their biggest supporter for years.
That’s it.
When I told them that my friends and I, although supporters of the Film Festival, had problems attending Tinseltown on principal, he said he understood, and hoped we could enjoy the films at the other locations provided this year. I told him we had and thanked him. I mean really, what else was he supposed to say? I don’t know what I was expecting. Maybe a little heat and passion? Maybe I was just waiting for him to suddenly go off the record and level with me, and sympathize. To fully understand my conflict? Maybe he had the same conflict! But alas, I get it, he was at work, and he was doing his job. This however does not solve my dilemma.
“Cinemark has an LGBT liaison for community outreach; Cinemark provides domestic partner benefits for California team members; Cinemark hosts the annual Vancouver Queer Film Festival; and Cinemark works with the North Texas GLBT Chamber of Commerce as well as the Collin County Gay & Lesbian Alliance to arrange advance screenings for movies of interest to the LGBT community”, Bob Shimmin, a vice president of Cinemark, directly hired by Alan Stock, writes in his November 11th, 2008 (one week after the vote) article on 365gay.com. He continues to explain that Mr. Stock’s mormon beliefs against gay marriage have never come into the workplace, and that Mr. Stock’s contribution was completely independent of Cinemark.
“According to Cinemark’s Chairman, Lee Roy Mitchell, “it would be inappropriate to influence our employees’ position on personal issues outside the work environment especially on political, social or religious activities. Individual political actions, especially those outside of work are independent, individual acts of personal expression.””
Would this still be the case if Mr. Stock was a public financial contributor to the KKK? Because as far as I’m concerned, the disgusting commercials that his money was directly funding, such as the “Storm is Coming” advertisement are no less spiteful bigotry than a white hood.

I understand ALL of these facts and can differentiate between a business and a single human being. But unfortunately, making a beautiful cake with one rotten egg is truly going to spoil the whole eating-of-the-cake experience for me. That’s just the way it works.
In the end, my money is still going to someone whose beliefs are contradictory to advancing tolerance and educating the masses. Truly, any opinion that tells me that my lifestyle is less than, is by default perpetuating intolerance, and in turn hate. And if you happen to be running a business, then don’t expect to have MY money in YOUR hands.
The Queer Film Festival is not ready to take a stand in this, and I understand their prerogative, truly I do, for it’s not Cinemark, the company, the company letting them show their movies in their theatre, that is telling them that they don’t support same sex legal unions. But turning a blind eye on the trickle up the ladder to where that money is going, and the opinions that it’s fueling, is unjustifiable to me anymore.
As far as human rights go, I have never been more sure in my life, despite my sexuality, that I am on the good side of the fight between good and miseducated evil, because there is a clear difference between keeping someone down by taking away their rights, and gay people, just trying to achieve legal equality. I have just wanted the option that every other straight person on the face of the planet has, to dedicate themselves legally in marriage, without being told that my love means less than theirs.
“The days of settling for a fraction of equality are over.” Cleve Jones said at an inspired speech given at Sunset Beach this past pride. This coming from the man who must have felt a sense of accomplishment and pride standing up for his beliefs and helping the 1970’s boycott of Coors in all gay establishments across San Francisco’s Castro Street neighborhood. Is this the sort of “misguided boycotting” that Bob Shimmin hopes we don’t participate in at the end of his article? Then call me misguided. Because even though I’m sure I’m spending money at companies that aren’t as public about their beliefs, for the moment, my conscience is clean knowing that at the end of the day, every cent of my hard earned dollars in my 40 hour work week is, to the best of my knowledge, not going to people outrightly and publicly boasting of their misinformed perpetuations of hate across the world.
Submitted By: Nic O.
Wanna write? Have an opinion?
We’re excited to present this article, written by a guest writer, as part of “Sunday Submissions“. Do you have something to say? Send your article to sundays[at]homorazzi[dot]com each week by Friday to be considered!
Adam
August 23rd, 2009 at 3:29 pm
Apparently I just made the tying vote for “yes” on the poll for 6 to 6 ha.
Having worked in the not for profit arena of film I do understand having to make concessions sometimes to get your work out there… but being that the donor was the Chairman of cinemark I can’t fully agree with them showing films there. Not a proper martyr, i’ve never personally banned a drink or building or company for choices they’ve made, but for a festival that cherishes and promotes gay rights I think it’s a bit wrong to ignore the actions of this man. To take it to a bit of an extreme, while I wouldn’t condemn the entire catholic church if one of their parishoners killed someone, if the pope had done it I would be hard pressed to follow the religion. This Chairman isn’t just some ticket ripper with an opinion, it’s the guy in charge who’s opinions DO affect how cinemark works day in and day out and for that I’d hold his actions against the corporation as a whole.
Steven
August 23rd, 2009 at 5:46 pm
I don’t always agree with the views expressed on Homorazzi. Homorazzi are sponsoring Out on Screen, too.
Does this mean I should stop reading Homorazzi? Or boycott the queer film festival because Homorazzi is a sponsor?
Patrick
August 23rd, 2009 at 6:11 pm
Totally valid comment. While we are of course unable to fully agree with every aspect of the festival: every film’s point
of view, their directors actions off screen, every sponsor of th event and every person behind it, we absolutely recognize the importance of this demonstration and cherishing of gay society and so that is why we back the queer film festival. Still we see some aspects that we may not 100% agree with and that is why we posted this article. You’re welcome to choose to read us
or not but we hope you understand we try to look at the whole
picture.
Drew Dennis
August 25th, 2009 at 1:44 pm
Thought I’d take the opportunity to respond. We, at out on screen, were disappointed too when we learned in November of Allan Stock’s donation in support of Prop 8. We immediately discussed our concerns with Cinemark Tinseltown who has been very clear that Allan Stock’s personal donation does not in any way reflect the company’s values or endorsements. Cinemark has been an incredibly supportive partner to the festival — this year marks their 8th year as a Premier Sponsor. No other sponsor has committed consistently at that level. As well, their General Manager and local theatre staff are a dream to work with and continue to go out of their way to ensure our festival audience has a great experience while in their theatre.
In February and March we conducted both an informal poll with some of our volunteers and donors and an online survey through our newsletter list (distributed to over 6,000 members) asking for input and feedback on our position to continue our relationship with Cinemark Tinseltown. The survey results were overwhelmingly supportive of this. Below are a few stats from the survey:
21% of survey participants have attended the Festival for over 11 years!
97% would recommend the Festival to a friend or family member.
Tinseltown rated as our top Festival venue
88% of respondents support our decision to continue our relationship with Cinemark Tinseltown
One person commented, “I hope it can lead to more dialogue. Not everyone knows about Prop 8 and we need to not hide from conflict, but face it and aim for truth and fairness for all.”
To encourage some more dialogue, we hosted a panel discussion which followed the Aug 16 screening of the film For My Wife at Cinemark Tinseltown.
Feedback from our membership and audience is always welcome! We have an online Festival Theatre Survey and I encourage viewers to take a minute to share your own thoughts. http://www.queerfilmfestival.ca/
Thanks to everyone who attended the festival!
Timothy
August 25th, 2009 at 2:21 pm
I can’t help but shake the thought that ‘what if’ our forefathers chose to “encourage some more dialogue” instead of marching the streets of the Castro? Sometimes I feel like we are little boys fighting with toy guns against men with power and money.
Nic O.
August 25th, 2009 at 2:59 pm
Although I appreciate your response Drew (I was hoping you would respond), I feel like that diplomatic response gives nothing to my side (and others that share my sentiments) of the debate besides, “everyone else is doing it, why don’t you”.
This really is the kind of lackadaisical attitude shared by a generation who doesn’t want to make waves, and never really had to fight for much, but still rides on the backs of previous generation’s fights. I emailed my article to Mr. Cleve Jones, and he responded with part of his email saying, “It’s great to see people your age getting passionate about our struggle, sometimes I feel like your generation, despite all the technology, is very disconnected.”
Well I feel the response you gave was disconnected, and that the opinion (although not solely yours, as your survey showed), is a betrayal to the sort of fight we are all fighting for our fellow communities across the country, continent, and world.
frank S.
July 5th, 2010 at 7:06 pm
I think that this generation (i’m 21) is being completely lazy. We are no longer getting stones thrown at us on the streets, but we are years away from getting our rights. Because we are not restricted on a day to day basis, we are not fighting for the big picture. Before participating in the Vancouver Queer Film festival I would need to know that they donated an amount equal or greater to that of Alan Stock to dissolve the damage he has done with his personal donation.